Consolidated Time Lock Co., Cincinnati, Ohio - 1 movement

  A

  B

A. Model Dual Guard. A complex, and exquisitely made time lock using Dalton's patent. c. 1885. The Dalton  company was another short-lived firm as was Hall's Safe & Lock Co. and both were merged into Consolidated in 1880's. This lock is essentially the same as when made by Dalton when it was an independent firm.in 1879 and has many unusual features. It can be set to function periodically through the day and night as desired. It featured what the company called the Infallible backup combination lock and was available with an optional spring assist (seen on the right hand side of the case). The Dual Guard's Infallible mechanism had its own specially designed geared connection to the safe's combination spindle (located on the rear of the case). This specially designed Infallible operated a minute combination lock wholly included in the time lock. The tiny lock is visible behind and to the right of the time lock's dial. The movement was expensive to produce and wholesaled for more than the visually impressive two-movement Yale Double Pin Dial at over $500 - a great deal of money at the time. No other single movement time lock has as many parts or as complicated a movement. Fewer than 500 were made with less than ten known to survive.(1) case #474, movement #1055  file 31

B. Single movement Consolidated lock mounted to a combination lock by Joseph L. Hall, Cincinnati, Ohio. c. 1885. This is an important example of a short transition period that the development of time locks took. At first total control of the opening of the vault was not quite trusted to the time lock alone. The following is quoted from The Lure of the Lock, The John M. Mossman Collection, "This lock is of greatest possible interest as it contains a secret combination which can be used in case of "lockout". (Failure of the time lock). "This combination was held by the maker until an emergency arose when it would be telegraphed to the bank." Of course what's to prevent someone from inside the time lock company from performing an unauthorized entry? Seems to negate the entire purpose of the time lock in the first place. Soon, however, bankers realized the reliability of these locks, particularly when two or more movements were used to add redundancy. Movements made by E. Howard & Co., Boston, MA. made under the H. Gross patent of February 8, 1876. This is the only known example. case #3099, movement #3099, combination lock bolt #4072 file 9

Both of these locks represent a rare variety of 'transitional' time locks. Early locks that used both a time lock movement as well as an integral combination lock that could be used to open the safe in case of a timer failure. This was during a time when some bankers still did not quite trust the fact that their safe would be under total control of the time lock. Notice that these locks used only one movement. As noted above, the use of redundant movements obviated the need for all the complex and less reliable or secure backup approaches. It should be noted that in the entire history of the use of factory installed time locks with redundant movements, when the lock was properly used and serviced, and in the absence of tampering or efforts at forced entry to the safe, there has never been a total failure of a time lock resulting in the door being unable to be opened.