Consolidated Time Lock Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, 1 - movement,
large format featuring Benjamin Flint dog device; mounted to Hall's Premier Size #3
This time lock and combination lock contains all three important elements
outlined in Benjamin Flint's patent # 276,383, April 24, 1883.
Notice in the first photo the combination lock bolt. It has no provision for an
attachment via a clevis pin to the safe's bolt work (see third photo of safe
photos below). The bolt is currently in the outward, locked position. The action
of the bolt being withdrawn will allow the armature to drop as it rolls off the
edge releasing the safe's bolt work.
Front view of the time lock and rear elevation of the display unit complete with
combination lock dial work.
The Hall's Infallible Lockout Protection
™
system is illustrated. The blue armature shown coming from the lower right
hand corner of the time lock case is part of that system. The first photo shows where the dual fences are
located in the combination lock. The fence marked A. located at
the 12 o'clock position is for the regular combination known to the safe's
owner. The fence marked B. located at the 9 o'clock positionis the secondary fence using the "secret combination" that is known to
the Consolidated company and is used only in the event that there is a failure
of the time lock to bypass the time lock. In that event the Consolidated company
telegraphs the safe owner the bypass combination and it is first dialed in and
the time lock is disabled through the activation of that fence. Next the normal
combination must be dial in to ultimately open the safe.
The second photo shows a close up of the secondary fence. Here one can see the
row of five screw studs as well as another row of empty, threaded holes. If
someone was familiar with the construction of the Hall's Premier lock equipped
with the Infallible system it would be possible to deduce the secret combination
via a subtractive formula derived from the regular combination. In this example,
in order to make the lock manipulation quick and easy, the combination is 60,
60, 60, 60, 60. The secret combination is 40, 40, 40, 40, 40. So knowing this
one could use the subtraction of 20 from the regular combination to deduce the
secret one. This fence, as illustrated in Flint's patent, allows one to move the
five studs so as to add a lot more guess work to that formulaic deduction since
it is no longer a simple subtraction of a single factor from the regular
combination. The movement of a stud changes the combination by 2. Remember, that
if someone is trying to bypass an intact, running, time lock, the automatic
reset system, which is also a part of Flint's patent, puts the time lock back on
guard between five to ten seconds after the bypass combination is dialed in,
preventing one from entering the normal combination in time to bypass a working
time lock. This fence makes this nearly impossible to do so in time unless one
knows the configuration of the studs as well as the subtractive formula. As
shipped from the factory all the five studs are left in-line. Any qualified
service tech can change these locations so the secret combination is altered and
is thus only known to the safe's owner, completely eliminating the possibility
of collusion between an employee of the Consolidated company and one who knows
the regular safe combination. Along with the automatic reset found within the
Infallible System the time lock was extremely reliable and secure even with only
a single time lock movement. The Infallible system was so reliable and effective
that it became the basis for a large segment of their time locks. The cost of
time lock movements was the single largest cost component of a time lock. So
having a reliable time lock that could utilize only one movement and still be
reliable gave the Hall's / Consolidated company a cost advantage over other makers
that used two movements; and they all did. Of course these single movement time
locks could only be used with the Infallible system and this was only found
within the Hall's line of combination locks. However, Hall was the dominant maker
of combination locks at this time. But as time went by the redundancy provided
by two or more movements did supplant the single movement Infallible system.
One reason was the fact that these had to be used with the Hall's line of
combination locks, whereas later designs generally worked on the safe's bolt
work, allowing those to operate across all lines of safe configurations. Another
was the cost of movements declined, the advent of modular
designs and the fact that redundant movements were easy to understand in the
context of security. See video below for a demonstration of the Infallible
Lockout Protection System
™.
This video first shows a demonstration of the Hall's Infallible Lockout Protection™
system. Next a demonstration of the Hall's Infallible Chronometric™
device. Hopefully this video will clearly reveal how the Infallible system works
why the Hall / Consolidated company's single movement design was so ingenious
and successful despite the obvious lack of movement redundancy.
The first patent page is from Kook and Hall's 1879 application and
illustrates their initial Infallible system. The next two pages are from
Flint's 1883 application and contains two important improvements to the
Infallible system. The first is the permutation fence and the second the reset
system. The third was his new design for dogging the boltwork.
One can see the similarity between Figure 4
in the third patent drawing page to the left
and the actual time lock movement above. The
red arrow in the photo points to the reset
device that was improved upon in Flint's
1883 patent from the original 1879 patent by
W. Kook and J.L. Hall as illustrated in
first patent page, Figure 3. The
brass-colored lever located just above the
arrow rides upon the contrate wheel (solid
wheel). When the bypass combination is
successfully dialed in, the post upon which
the lever assembly is mounted is rotated a
few degrees counterclockwise and is held by
a catch putting the time lock-off guard. The
post has a spring that is biased to rotate
that assembly back, counterclockwise, to the
on-guard position. If the lock is running
the contrate wheel is rotating clockwise and
thus pulls the brass lever to the right and
within 5 to 10 seconds trips the lever
assembly back to the on-guard position. This
prevents someone from bypassing a
functioning time lock even if he knows both
the regular and bypass combinations. Flint's
permutation bypass fence makes this even
more difficult to accomplish. See video for
a demonstration of this reset function.
In 1883, the Consolidated Time Lock Company produced a time lock
patented by Benjamin Flint that dogs the boltwork rather than the attached time
lock's fence. This was an unusual design for consolidated, a company with more
than ten years of success marketing time locks that controlled an attached
combination lock. The design features single-movement Infallible Lockout
Protection System™. The the mechanism to act directly on the boltwork requited an
addition of the armature projecting from the right lower corner of the time lock
case.
This example is paired with a Joseph Hall Premier size #3 five tumbler
safe lock. There is no record of how many of these double-acting time locks were
made by Consolidated. This is the only known surviving example and is the same
as illustrated in John Erroll's book. (1)4 7/8"w x 4 5/8"h x
2 5/8"d, case#
2558, movement
#2558, combination lock, 6"w x 4"h x 2 1/2"d, bolt #2313. file 198
Below are photos of a similar time lock and Hall Premier combination lock but
issued in the conventional configuration. Look carefully at the third photo.
Here the lock's bolt has the normal slotted design equipped with a clevis pin to attach
to the safe's bolt work which can just be seen attached to it.
(1)
American Genius, Nineteenth Century Bank locks and Time Locks,
David and John Erroll, pp. 218-219.