
Two movement prototype
There are two known examples of this lock. One in the Mossman Collection
at the General Mechanics and Tradesmen Society Museum, New York City
and this one. The Mossman example is illustrated in John Erroll's
book American Genius on pages 256 and 257.



The case is almost certain to have been made by the
Hall/Consolidated Company. The case has the identical type of counter-sunk pin-hinged
door, nickel plating and hook-shaped dogging devise designed to lock onto
the fence of a Hall combination lock, or an automatic as seen on their line of time locks.
Hall/Consolidated also acted as a source for the Chicago Safe & Lock
Company's first introduction of time lock, their
Gem model.
There, the case design is a direct copy of the early Hall dual movement cases
but larger overall.
In the Chicago instance, the movements were also made to the same design as
used by Hall and were produced by E. Howard. The movements illustrated here
are made by the
Waterbury Clock Co. This leads one to think that the lock may have been made
as a prototype with the inventor's having the case made by an established
firm for the case and other ancillary components.
Another example of this inter-company cooperation in producing a prototype
and patent models is a time lock made by
Overmyer & Huston.
There are two prototype locks known to have been made by these inventors.
Their Model 1 which I believe was only produced as a patent model and their
Model 2 which is displayed in the Mossman Collection in New York City. The
Model 1 may have has some connection with Hall, but the Model 2 case is
another example of Hall's case design with the timelock components to the
inventor's design being installed.

The movement is marked as being made by the Waterbury Clock Co., Waterbury
Connecticut.

The front decorative plate is removed revealing the twin movements. They are
independent of each other, however they are both mounted to the back plate
and the front plate secures the front of the spring barrel arbor. Since the
movements are mirrored, they must have been specially made for this lock, if
they were simply "off the shelf" they would not be so.
The movements are quite simple and of a lower quality. There are no
escapement pallet or escape wheel pivot jewels. The only jewels are located
only on the upper and lower pivot holes for the balance wheels. Those
balances are solid brass rims; providing no temperature compensation as
would be seen in most time lock movements. The lack of these features
violate the rule where reliability is an all important priority.
Removing the movement from the case is tricky as the springs are not
enclosed by a spring barrel and push fairly hard against the case sides. One
can see the witness marks of scratches on the inner vertical case walls of
prior removal and insertions. Another indication of this being a prototype.

Front decorative plate is removed revealing simple stamped dial wheels. If
one looks closely, the number are hand stamped with dies that were numerated
0 through 9.
An examination of of the lock shows a close similarity to the type of case
made by the Hall/Consolidated company. Also the dogging device is the same
style as this company. This author believes that the this lock was made or
at least assisted by the the Hall/Consolidated company using their case and
bolt feature with the remaining components to the inventor's design.
The pivoted locking
lever is loosely similar to Diebold's, on their three movement TISCO lock,
but this is purely speculative.
In American Genius, by John and David Erroll the
Mossman example below is illustrated with the following text:
The time lock
shown here is listed in Lure of the Lock (a book
published in connection with the Mossman Collection), with the following
description:
There is no clue to the manufacturer of this lock, which was donated by the
Mosler Safe Co., Hamilton Ohio. There are two forty-six hour movements. 6
1/2 x 2 1/2 x 2 inches. Middle shelf. See last photo below.
Little has come to light about this time lock specifically in the
intervening eight-eight years, but it shares some interesting features with
other time locks that hints at its source.
The time lock does not carry an attribution and is not a known production
design, but during the 1890's the Diebold Company began manufacturing for
use in its Tisco line of of safes and the Tisco-specific time locks were
about the same size and shape as this one. Moreover, the Tisco-specific
time locks featured a lever on the case bottom that could hold the release
hook open, allowing the safe to be closed with the combination lock only
during business hours. The same lever is visible here, to the left of the
release hook. This time lock also has the same art nouveau acid etching used
by Diebold on its early time lock designs.
The movement format, however, is unique, with its two horizontally aligned
escapements visible over the movement cover. A design so far afield from
other time locks would normally expected to be patented, but no patent for
this time lock is known to have been granted. Consequently, this is thought
to be a prototype or experimental design assembled by Diebold around the
period of the 1890's when the company was developing the Tisco safe line but
that never went into production.
This author does not see much connection to Diebold. From the beginning of
Diebold's entry into the time lock business around 1894, they used movements
made by E. Howard. No other time lock known used a Waterbury movement. The
case measurements are very different from the Diebold Tisco three movement
with the bottom locking lever, that case is 5 1/4"w x 3 3/8"h x 1 7/8"d
while the lock here is 6 1/2"w x 3 1/2"h x 2 1/8"d. Diebold's two movement
Tisco was even smaller and did not feature the locking lever. The front
plate design, while in the manner of art nouveau as were the early Diebold
cases, has a design and execution that are very different. This lock's
design is far less intricate and less well executed with uneven lines and
evidence that it was executed by hand, as the Diebold cases had a finer more
accurate appearance.