

B
B. c. 1970. This is a rare and early
electro-mechanical time lock with a weekly calendar function. The time locks
are motor-driven and function individually on the same redundancy principal
as conventional mechanical time locks. However this also included a weekly
calendar function where the lock could be applied any any single or
combination of days. Very few mechanical time locks had this function, the only others that this author knows of is an early experimental lock
by Mosler which
saw little commercial usage and a lock by the short-lived
Stewart company; both
in the 1890's. Unlike any other time lock, the Chubb lock is not physically
connected to the safe's bolt work whatsoever. The bolt dog is another
electro-mechanical device triggered remotely by a signal from the time lock,
see electrical connector in photos. This example did not last long and was
recalled from the market as it was found to have caused a few lock outs -
something that must never happen and is the death knell for any time lock
design. Few were made before the recall, and nearly of of the recalled units
were destroyed. There is one other example of this lock in the Harry C.
Miller lock collection in Nicholasville, Kentucky as well as two others in private collections. 8"w x 7"h x
2.5"d. file 173
C
C. Model #9. c. 1970's. In 1957-58 Mosler purchased Canadian
based Dominion Safe & Vault and Pollard Mfg. and formed Mosler – Taylor
Safes Ltd. Mosler then constructed a plant in Brampton, Ontario.
In 1960 Chubb purchased controlling interest in the Canadian based Mosler –
Taylor Safes Ltd. (Chubb – Mosler and Taylor on the dial between 1960 and
1980) and Mosler was out of the picture except for the name. After 1980,
only Chubb was on the dial.
The old Mosler square movement body was abandoned in favor of
the 'coffin' style Swiss made movements by the Saint Blaise company which
now mirror the same body design as those used in the contemporary Yale time
locks. Movements are marketed in the USA by
the Herman D. Steel Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Case #1213, movement #117017,
#117018. 4"w x 3.5"h x 2 1/4"d
file 36
D
D.
Model #11.
Manufactured in the 1980's and is the three movement version, based on the
same design as the two movement above. However this one has no attribution
to Mosler and the word LOCK is also in French, BARRER, so this was meant for
international use because of the international nature of
the lock, the attribution to Mosler was eliminated. Movements are
Swiss made by the Saint Blaise company and marketed in the USA by the Herman D. Steel Company,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Case #1076, movement #14339, #14340, 143441. file 304

The Chubb company did not begin to market time locks under their
own name until the 1960's. Almost all safe makers - Yale, Diebold, Mosler, Consolidated
Banker's Dustproof as well as Chubb did not actually manufacture their own time lock
mechanisms. This was subcontracted to a company, experienced in making time movements. In
the 19th and early quarter of the 20th century this was most often the E. Howard Company
of Boston, Massachusetts. Illinois Watch and Waltham pocket watch movements were also
sometimes used. Only Sargent and Greenleaf made their own time locks.
There are several websites devoted to Chubb and his
lock company.
http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/Museum/locks/gazetteer/chubbs.htm
, http://www.chubbarchive.co.uk/
A few other time lock makers such as
Time Masters, Inc.,
and Sargent and Greenleaf
tried to replace the mechanical movements with digital timers. The point of
these firms efforts was to eliminate the mechanical watch movements that
were integral to all time locks since their introduction in the 1870's.
Those movements required regular inspection and maintenance from a skilled
person to ensure proper operation to the satisfy the bank's insurance
company. But in the end, the electronic devices also require regular
maintenance, if for no other reason than the replacement of batteries, let
alone the problems associated with electronic component failures much to the
chagrin of those same insurance companies. The tried and true designs of the
mechanical movement proven over the past 140 years were simply more cost
effective than the new approaches and to this day those mechanical time
locks controlled by wind up mechanical movements are still in use today.
